I want to like Chris Bohjalian. Rather, I like him. I just don’t like his books. Rather, I liked Midwives, and I liked The
Double Bind, and there must have been others…but I’ve been disappointed
with him lately, and it makes me sad. I
think he must be a really cool guy – a true intellectual, a Renaissance man
hanging out in the mountains, conducting all sorts of background research into
all kinds of crazy stuff. I once read an
interview with him, and no, I cannot quote it exactly, but I recall a discussion
on how he chooses his subject matter. It
seems that the prevailing wisdom in writing is to write about one’s own
experience: most writers write about what they know. Conversely, Bohjalian chooses to write about what he wants to know. So, if he wants to
learn about midwifery, or dowsing, or veganism, or transsexuality, or homeopathy,
then that’s what he centers his novel around.
I feel like this is a novel (heh) approach to novel writing, and I
applaud it, in theory. (It’s his
practice that is the problem.) Bohjalian
charts his own course in his narrative decisions, and I appreciate his rogue
approach. He’s got balls.
However. And this is
a big however. I’ve been really
disappointed with Bohjalian’s last few offerings. I think he overwrites. I really
don’t care about the etched design on the interior of a bracelet that some
background character is wearing. It’s
not crucial to the action, and it does nothing to add to characterization or atmosphere. I don’t want to read six pages of Emily
weighing her options internally when intruders are in her house and her
daughters are in danger. Get upstairs
and defend your kids, slowpoke! (Incidentally,
Emily is just annoying. Let’s hang out with a bunch of old ladies who
are obsessed with changing our names via a ceremony, so that we can be in their
crazy garden club. That’s normal. And yeah, sure, girls, go on over to Geriatric
Anise’s house after school every day.
Perfect, sounds great. Whaaa?).
But I digress. Anyway, these
constant plodding details serve only to slow the plot. The
Night Strangers had so much potential, but was ultimately disappointing. So many good ingredients – a haunted
house! Witches, twins, and PTSD! A family, trying to reconnect after tragedy! But the unnecessary descriptions made. Me. Crazy. Bohjalian needs to get down to business and
tell the story already.
I noticed a lot of passive voice as well. Frequently, a scene would start midway
through, and then one character would recount the previous action (italics
mine): “They had been picked up after
school by Anise and brought home so they could start setting up their very own
greenhouse. Once more, instead of doing
homework or attending a dance class or having a music lesson, the girls were going to be gardening.” Here’s an example of how a mechanical or
grammatical choice truly impedes tone.
Passive voice tends to offset tension (something crucial to a ghost story), thereby weakening the writing. Again, Bohjalian’s style disrupts the overall
story.
Additionally, Bohjalian’s villains came across as
hokey. Silly, like
caricatures. They all had plant names, for goodness sake. I mean, really – a coven of immortal witches
that centers their craft around greenhouses in order to develop an anti-ageing tincture? A tincture that requires the blood from a
child? And everyone in the coven goes
along with this? (Incidentally, the word
“tincture” was overused to the point of absurdity. It was jarring,
I tell you. Somebody needs to tell
Bohjalian about MS Word’s handy “Find and Replace” feature.) The idea of an entire congregation of murderers running rampant through the White
Mountains was just too unbelievable, which prevented any kind of connection
with the characters. So, even though the
plant-ladies were obviously sociopathic, and even though Chip was losing his
mind and murderous, I just didn’t care.
Bohjalian never really made me nervous, which means the book failed, as Gothic
tales go. A scary book has to be scary.
So there you have it.
The Night Strangers
disappoints. Sad face.
***You know, I don’t like this post much. I’m having a lot of trouble with it, but I’m
putting it out there anyway. I think my
issue is this: I didn’t like the book,
but I didn’t exactly hate it, either…so
I guess I find it challenging to have a unique voice about a topic I’m not
passionately for or against. Bloggers/writers out there – what do you do? Do you love everything you put out
there? Or do you sometimes just quit the
agonizing, say “enough, already” and hit POST?
What’s your advice?***
Great post Sarah. I totally relate to the dislike/like part of your thoughts. You have read the book, you have spent precious hours reading and thinking about this book. Therefore it is important because it is now apart of you, even though you do not "like" it. Does that make sense? I am glad you reviewed a book that did not resonate with you. It was well written and brings up annoying habits writers can tend to lean toward over time. I CANNOT stand the over explaining. This is a huge reason I speed read. (Not recommending) Nothing slows the story like a bracelet description. We have to read things we kinda like in order to completely appreciate what is good. Great post. Thank you!
ReplyDeletethanks! i feel like this is definitely an area where i can grow as a writer/reviewer - finding something creative and interesting about a book that wasn't so interesting. the challenge then becomes about making the review more interesting than the book! :>) and i love your comment about how we need to read things we "kinda like" to help us know what is good - the same argument can be made about visual art, i think (which is a great reason to be anti-censorship, additionally).
DeleteInteresting..I just finished Double Bind. I found it slow at some parts, but haunting and liked it. So, he can write, just maybe listening too closely to his publisher....
ReplyDeleteYes, I don't know what it is, because I remember liking several of his books. (Which is why I keep reading him!) He also writes a column about living in New Hampshire - he's really good at that, too.
DeleteSo, I didn't really LOVE the book either. But, I really wanted to know what happend. So maybe I did LIKE it....I couldn't put it down, but I was sad about the product when I was done.
ReplyDeleteConversely, if someone uses the word "tincture" EVER AGAIN, I will mix some shit with a mortar and pestal and MURDER them with it.
That is all. LOVE YOU!
I know - I wanted to know how it all ended too, but was disappointed by the ending. You make me laugh!
Delete