I've only had the book a few months, but already it looks like somebody put it through a garbage disposal. That should show you how well-loved it is already.
So it won the Pulitzer, and so that should be enough. But really, and as much as this word is a complete cop-out, it’s utterly amazing.
Tartt first came on the literary scene with The Secret History in 1992, and followed
up with The Little Friend in
2002. The Goldfinch came out last year (2013). Are you noticing a pattern? The woman takes ten years to write a book, a thing
that’s quite unique in this era of “publish or perish.” (Actually, some of the first sketches of the
book date back as far as 1993!) Tartt
virtually refuses to be a slave to the publishing machine, giving few
interviews or readings, and generally bowing out of the promotions side of book
sales. She’s not even on Twitter and
largely lets the work speak for itself. What?
Anyway, the story itself is great and her characters
positively transcendent. In terms of plot: It is laden with bad decisions and terrible
situations and hard drugs and art and esoteric shit about furniture restoration
(which, really, were some of my favorite bits, because I’m like, ALL IN when it
comes to esoteric shit nobody knows anything about. I mean, all that restoration stuff could’ve
been one hundred percent made up and I’d be like, “Great. Love it anyway.” Moving on.)
The centerpoint of the novel is an actual painting entitled “The
Goldfinch” by Fabritius, who Tartt describes as “the missing link between Rembrandt
and Vermeer.” Not to give too much away: The painting survives an explosion in New
York City (shades of 9/11) and then moves through the novel as a talisman to
Theo, the main character. And if you
want more than that, you’ll have to read it.
But here’s the BEAUTY.
Boris is the best-drawn character I’ve EVER READ. Ever. Ever.
He’s compared to Dickens’ artful dodger, and he is so real
he throbs. He moves; he tears up the pages and walks
into your living room. I’m not sure if
I’ve ever had as much of an experience of character-LOSS as I had at the end of
this novel – HE WAS THAT REAL.
And if that isn’t enough, Tartt herself has been compared
both to Tolstoy and Dickens themselves.
The woman is only fifty and has only three books to her name, but you
can’t read a review of her work without seeing yet another comparison to those
behemoths. (Tartt admits to being raised
on a steady diet of Dickens and recognizes that she’s internalized his
style. Also, she loves the comparison. “Who wouldn’t?” she asks.)
A couple of asides.
During my mourning of the book’s end, I scoured the internet and found a
couple of amazing things about this novel that are just so cool I had to
share.
One: The actual
painting “The Goldfinch” really did
survive an explosion back in 1654, in Delft, yet Tartt didn’t even realize this
until after she wrote her own
explosion scenes in the novel. Read more here.
Two: The original
publication of the novel coincided to the
day with an art show opening at Manhattan’s Frick Collection. (This was not intentionally
orchestrated.) And guess which painting
was included in the exhibition? Yep. More here.
Basically, STOP EVERYTHING YOU’RE DOING AND READ THIS RIGHT
NOW. It’s in my top ten all-time
list. (OMG, that’s a total blog
post. Sarah’s Top Ten. What’s in yours?)